Chapter IV: Biosecurity and Dual-Use Research in the Life Sciences

Science and Security in a Post 9/11 World: A Report Based on Regional Discussions Between the Science and Security Communities.
Chapter IV: Biosecurity and Dual-Use Research in the Life Sciences
In the life sciences, dual-use research “encompasses biological research with legitimate scientific purpose, the results of which may be misused to pose a biologic threat to public health and/or national security.” Generally, the term tends to refer to technologies that have both a civilian and a military use. The dual-use research dilemma in the life sciences refers to the conundrum of producing and publishing research within the life sciences that is directed toward or intended to improve public health, animal health, or agricultural productivity, but that in the hands of a rogue state, terrorist group, or individual, could be used to impair public health. As early as the 18th century, greater understanding of the smallpox virus led to the first viral vaccine, as well as use of the virus as a bioweapon. In the wake of the anthrax attacks of 2001 and heightened concerns regarding terrorism, the more tangible possibility of bioterrorism has increased fears and concerns regarding the performance and publication of dual-use research.

Author:
National Academy of Sciences
Publish Date:
2007

Chemical Warfare: Many Unanswered Questions

This document is a GAO report responding to the Chairman of the Committee on Foreign Affairs House of Representatives, Clement J. Zablocki’s, 1982 request for the GAO to “assess and synthesize the currently existing information describing deterrence against the use of chemical weapons, Soviet and U.S. chemical warfare capabilities, binary chemical weapons, and the implications of binary weapons production for disarmament negotiations.”

Author:
U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO)
Publish Date:
1983

Chemical Weapons Convention

The Chemical Weapons Convention is an international treaty prohibiting the generation, storage and use of chemical weapons.

Author:
Chemical Weapons Convention
Publish Date:
Jan 13 1993

Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Risk Assessments: DHS Should Establish More Specific Guidance for Their Use

Since 2004, DHS’s use of its CBRN risk assessments to inform its CBRN response plans has varied, from directly influencing information in the plans to not being used at all. DHS guidance states that response planning and resource decisions should be informed by risk information. GAO’s analysis showed that DHS used its CBRN risk assessments to directly inform 2 of 12 CBRN response plans GAO identified because planners considered the risk assessments to be more accurate than earlier DHS planning assumptions. For another 7 of the 12 plans, DHS officials said that the assessments indirectly informed the plans by providing background information prior to plan development. However, GAO could not independently verify this because DHS officials could not document how the risk assessments influenced the information contained in the plans. GAO’s analysis found general consistency between the risk assessments and the plans. For the remaining 3 plans, DHS officials did not use the risk assessments to inform the plans; for 2 of the 3 plans DHS officials told GAO they were not aware of the assessments. DHS officials also noted that there was no departmental guidance on when or how the CBRN risk assessments should be used when developing such plans.

Author:
U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO)
Publish Date:
January 25, 2012

China’s Emerging Global Health and Foreign Aid Engagement in Africa

“This volume is a compilation of papers that were written for the Conference on China’s Emerging Global Health and Foreign Aid Engagement, sponsored by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) and the China Institute of International Studies (CIIS), in Beijing on May 24, 2011, as part of a larger CSIS initiative to examine the global health engagement of the BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India, and China). Focusing specifically on China’s health and foreign aid engagement in Africa, the volume includes contributions by U.S. and Chinese experts.”

Author:
The Center for Strategic and International Studies and the China Institute of International Studies
Publish Date:
November 30, 2011